because Maastricht ireland is born as a starting point to reassert the dominance of the market. pro

Missing a parameter to a target rate of unemployment that today is an average of over 11%, the same level of post-war (with the problem that unlike the current post-war unemployment is becoming structural)
So why not also enter one of the objectives to be achieved by each country to bring the unemployment rate down to 5%, which, so to speak, is the goal that has been given at this time of the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve of the United States?
because Maastricht ireland is born as a starting point to reassert the dominance of the market. proper course to protect the big players. but one of the things that has never been under discussion (and there is a reason) was the level of employment protection. ireland the natural unemployment, understood ireland as the appropriate ireland level for the functioning of labor markets neoliberalmente understood, has always been one of the cornerstones of European integration. so much so that even in the core countries, while low unemployment, underemployment is widespread through paid work at the level from slavery with government subsidy attached to prevent subsequent riots in the streets.
Could it be that the PURPOSE of the Maastricht Treaty is precisely to GET structural unemployment of 10%. and 15% to lower the cost of labor? And right now that is reached immediately want to spoil?
It should look at the goals that the EU stands to accomplish. Looking at the current Treaties, the TEU and the TFEU, it is understood that the key objectives are price stability and sound public finances (Article 119 TFEU) and in the name of these two objectives are decisions (or "broad" art . 121 TFEU) to address ireland political ireland and economic institutions at the top. However things ireland were once very different. Going to watch the Treaty establishing the European ireland Economic Community (1957), ireland in particular Title II, Part III - the governing economic policy ireland - you can see how much attention is paid to economic policy and balance of payments . According to Art. 104, the main objective is to balance the balance of payments can be trusted to ensure its currency. In addition, ireland Article. 107 states that the exchange rate policy is a matter of common interest. Well ... now it's easy to see how the eurozone crisis, or the crisis ireland of the balance of payments, is due to a "distraction" of the European ireland legislator in this matter does not enter more than the sort order. With the adoption of the single currency is true that the nominal exchange rate between the countries are constant, but the real exchange rates have changed and how! Not surprisingly, only in 2011 with the approval of the Six Pack, the Commission has introduced a procedure on macroeconomic imbalances, including the steps 4 and 5 as you mentioned in the article. Sorry for the length of the comment, I hope I was helpful. Good day and good luck!
Latest Italy sells 35% of the Cassa networks to China for 2 billion Why the euro fell to its lowest for eight months and 5 months on the dollar against the yen an army in Europe (25 million) ireland of the unemployed. Why not insert the lens employment between the poles of Maastricht? Enough with the nominal rates. Sovereign risk is measured by the net real interest rates. Here's how Letter @ matteorenzi / 2. Could you explain what you mean by structural reforms? Because it is impossible (and unfair) to imitate Germany The ECB mimics the Fed in form but in substance there is an abyss ..... The BoT pay negative real interest rates. We are the first "bubble of financial repression"
Who are they