Continuity trains and discontinuity Hermeneutics: Agostino Marchetto vs. Giuseppe Alberigo | Good News
Vatican II 50th anniversary of the counsels and in the same year I believe will continue and so will continue this blog in the Vatican II debate about the wrong stuff. Recently trains I summarized trains in John O'Malley and partners in the writings of a two-part series of articles Did Vatican II, no?
At the time, I mentioned briefly the Archbishop Agostino Marchetto book Vatican II's history, in which he criticizes, in particular, led by Giuseppe Alberigon "Bologna school" interpretation of Vatican II. Now I return to the subject in more depth.
It is recalled that Pope Benedict XVI presented trains the first years of the Pope of Rome, Christmas speech under the regimen of the church has been living side by side two ways to interpret the hermeneutics of Vatican II Council. The second he called the "hermeneutics of discontinuity and transition", the second "reform hermeneutics," or - as he referred trains to the apostolic exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis letter - "hermeneutics of continuity" (footnote 6). According to the Pope the former is produced by damage to the latter bear good fruit.
Giuseppe Agostino Marchetto Alberigo and can be seen as the two hermeneutics of personification. Alberigo (1926-1927) and Marchetto (1940 -) are both Italian, the former professor of the layman, trains the latter Archbishop. Alberigo led to a five point of Vatican II's historical series of publications, trains which have been translated into several languages. He also wrote a shorter history of Vatican trains II, which is available in English as A Brief History of Vatican II (2006) and The exam also at the University. trains
Alberigo followed the counsels of the Vatican II as part of the so-called very close. Bologna workshops, the core of which formed the addition to him, the Cardinal Archbishop of Bologna Giacomo Lercaro and his theologians Giuseppe trains Dossetti. Alberigon long-Vatican II history of the English edition of the delivery of said Joseph A. Komonchak, a short history in turn wrote a foreword to John O'Malley.
Mentioned trains in the preface O'Malley introduces two hermeneutical camps as follows: first, the counsels did not do much other than strengthened the faith of the Church trains live happily ever after, second, again did more. Alberigo falls into the latter camp.
The Archbishop Agostino Marchetto the English version of the book The Second Vatican Ecumenical Council - A Counterpoint for the History of the Council (2010) trains wrote the foreword to a book translator Kenneth D. Whitehead. In it, he refers to Benedict XVI's friend Cardinal Ruin speech Marchetto book release event. Marchetto Ruin of the book is the complete opposite of Alberigon and the "Bologna school" hermeneutics of discontinuity, represented by Marchetto himself calls the foreword to the "ideological."
Since I presented last "discontinuity" hermeneutics trains O'Malley and partners on the basis of the book, I begin this post Marchetto "hermeneutics of continuity" and its arguments. Marchetto 700-page book is composed almost entirely of "hermeneutics of discontinuity" of representative books of the critical book estimates. Only at the end of the book there are a few Marchetto your article, in which he presents the arguments trains on behalf of the hermeneutics of continuity.
Marchetto foundation of the argument is how the Popes John XXIII since the Vatican II interpreted. He quotes John XXIII's opening speech counsels, in which he makes a difference in the content of the deposit of faith and its presentation. Updating the mode of presentation in no way imply the repeal of prior learning. On the contrary, counsels purpose was to maintain a constant tradition.
Paul VI, in turn, said: "We will continue our predecessors job: defend the holy church doctrine or practice trains errors that threaten it today inside and out", "It is not true, if anyone, it is there that Vatican II represented some kind of 'liberation' of the Church teaching, or that the counsels authorized or endorsed some form of adaptation or conformism of our time and the mentality of the negative aspects of the transient. "
John Paul II continued on the same line: "The Church has always understood trains the content of the Catholic dogma of sound hermeneutics rules. These rules will increase internal frame to the Catholic faith, they do not come from an outside source, I believe. It is a serious mistake to read the documents, and counsels to imagine, then, that the counsels to represent in some way in the past in relation to burglary. In reality, the documents set against a completely all-time continuum, I believe. "Popes in addition to the 1985 piispainsynodi is Marchetto side.
Marchetto's main argument is, therefore, the Church's official line. Auktoriteettiargumentin trains addition Marchetto put through the book a number of critical remarks Alberigon management
Vatican II 50th anniversary of the counsels and in the same year I believe will continue and so will continue this blog in the Vatican II debate about the wrong stuff. Recently trains I summarized trains in John O'Malley and partners in the writings of a two-part series of articles Did Vatican II, no?
At the time, I mentioned briefly the Archbishop Agostino Marchetto book Vatican II's history, in which he criticizes, in particular, led by Giuseppe Alberigon "Bologna school" interpretation of Vatican II. Now I return to the subject in more depth.
It is recalled that Pope Benedict XVI presented trains the first years of the Pope of Rome, Christmas speech under the regimen of the church has been living side by side two ways to interpret the hermeneutics of Vatican II Council. The second he called the "hermeneutics of discontinuity and transition", the second "reform hermeneutics," or - as he referred trains to the apostolic exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis letter - "hermeneutics of continuity" (footnote 6). According to the Pope the former is produced by damage to the latter bear good fruit.
Giuseppe Agostino Marchetto Alberigo and can be seen as the two hermeneutics of personification. Alberigo (1926-1927) and Marchetto (1940 -) are both Italian, the former professor of the layman, trains the latter Archbishop. Alberigo led to a five point of Vatican II's historical series of publications, trains which have been translated into several languages. He also wrote a shorter history of Vatican trains II, which is available in English as A Brief History of Vatican II (2006) and The exam also at the University. trains
Alberigo followed the counsels of the Vatican II as part of the so-called very close. Bologna workshops, the core of which formed the addition to him, the Cardinal Archbishop of Bologna Giacomo Lercaro and his theologians Giuseppe trains Dossetti. Alberigon long-Vatican II history of the English edition of the delivery of said Joseph A. Komonchak, a short history in turn wrote a foreword to John O'Malley.
Mentioned trains in the preface O'Malley introduces two hermeneutical camps as follows: first, the counsels did not do much other than strengthened the faith of the Church trains live happily ever after, second, again did more. Alberigo falls into the latter camp.
The Archbishop Agostino Marchetto the English version of the book The Second Vatican Ecumenical Council - A Counterpoint for the History of the Council (2010) trains wrote the foreword to a book translator Kenneth D. Whitehead. In it, he refers to Benedict XVI's friend Cardinal Ruin speech Marchetto book release event. Marchetto Ruin of the book is the complete opposite of Alberigon and the "Bologna school" hermeneutics of discontinuity, represented by Marchetto himself calls the foreword to the "ideological."
Since I presented last "discontinuity" hermeneutics trains O'Malley and partners on the basis of the book, I begin this post Marchetto "hermeneutics of continuity" and its arguments. Marchetto 700-page book is composed almost entirely of "hermeneutics of discontinuity" of representative books of the critical book estimates. Only at the end of the book there are a few Marchetto your article, in which he presents the arguments trains on behalf of the hermeneutics of continuity.
Marchetto foundation of the argument is how the Popes John XXIII since the Vatican II interpreted. He quotes John XXIII's opening speech counsels, in which he makes a difference in the content of the deposit of faith and its presentation. Updating the mode of presentation in no way imply the repeal of prior learning. On the contrary, counsels purpose was to maintain a constant tradition.
Paul VI, in turn, said: "We will continue our predecessors job: defend the holy church doctrine or practice trains errors that threaten it today inside and out", "It is not true, if anyone, it is there that Vatican II represented some kind of 'liberation' of the Church teaching, or that the counsels authorized or endorsed some form of adaptation or conformism of our time and the mentality of the negative aspects of the transient. "
John Paul II continued on the same line: "The Church has always understood trains the content of the Catholic dogma of sound hermeneutics rules. These rules will increase internal frame to the Catholic faith, they do not come from an outside source, I believe. It is a serious mistake to read the documents, and counsels to imagine, then, that the counsels to represent in some way in the past in relation to burglary. In reality, the documents set against a completely all-time continuum, I believe. "Popes in addition to the 1985 piispainsynodi is Marchetto side.
Marchetto's main argument is, therefore, the Church's official line. Auktoriteettiargumentin trains addition Marchetto put through the book a number of critical remarks Alberigon management
No comments:
Post a Comment