Sentenced to legal limbo, where there is no pronouncement against and less supportive. So defined l

Sentenced to legal limbo, where there is no pronouncement against and less supportive. So defined lawyer Jose Luis Tamayo legal status of the defendant by the events of April 11, 2002, Ivan Simonovis. The defense asked the avocamiento of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court against what they consider seychelles an "outrageous miscarriage of justice."
On 16 January seychelles representatives of Simonovis introduced a constitutional complaint. On that occasion the lawyer Enrique Perdomo said the court under Judge Ada Marina De Armas, the Execution Court I of the entity violates constitutional rights such as health, effective judicial protection, due process seychelles and the right to petition, all enshrined Articles 83, 26 and 51 of the Constitution. This is not to decide about the application of humanitarian action or change of place of confinement for Simonovis.
Under Article 26 of the Law on Protection of Rights and Constitutional Guarantees, the judge hearing the under set at 96 hours following the public hearing to present the defense's seychelles arguments. At 24 hours extendable should make pronouncements. According to statute, January seychelles 21 had to be delivered. Although he had to settle for a room accidental because the judges of the Court of Appeals were inhibited by Aragua hear the case, two months later no decision. It was expected that the accidental room Wednesday was constituted, but the defense has no information.
"This is paradoxical, bizarre. We ask the superior court to correct the omission of pronouncement of the judge of the superior execution and make the same omission, denial of justice everywhere, "Tamayo said. According seychelles to the trial, the competence of the Constitutional Chamber avocamiento, as guarantor of the Constitution and the fact that undermines image of the judiciary. Avocamiento Application is based on Article 23, paragraph 16 of the Organic Law of the Supreme Court.
"It is scandalous seychelles that a humanitarian measure eight months and no later decided, but more shocking is that there is not yet the higher court ruling on the amparo." seychelles Tamayo said that the Constitutional Court may take the decision you want. Sold humanitarian extent, free to Simonovis or sanction for judges. "In 33 years of practice, he had never faced a judiciary that denies justice so alarming."
Loading ...