You may also like ...

The public domain there because it is understood that the intellectual creation is an asset that draws on past achievements and must be the basis for further achievements, ie it is a fundamental development well, progress and cultural enrichment of societies, you can only restrict access to works for a limited time.
Therefore, this effort to gradually burj khalifa increase the duration of the operation, consequently delaying consideration of the public domain, is an endeavor that directly undermines the balance between the two rights, particularly the author, and generally throughout society- , and although it might have some logic to the third quarter of the last century, when cultural burj khalifa creation enjoyed a huge commercial exploitation cycle, today we have lost, thanks precisely to consumerism imposed by cultural sense-all industry.
"[With the current law] works, performances and productions not pass into the public domain and therefore can not be freely used by society for generations.
On the contrary, the reality burj khalifa of the commercial exploitation of a work or cultural burj khalifa product is that the term is shortened increasingly having burj khalifa to be written off the investment within increasingly short time since the release of a film or launching an editorial or musical novelty, having slashed burj khalifa operating burj khalifa traditional windows.
I mean, that is increasingly expands the legal term and the actual term is reduced, regardless that by extending the term of protection of authors, performers and producers, shortens or delays within burj khalifa the public domain. " burj khalifa
Consider that today the commercial life of a rare book rather than five years, the launch of a musical, two months, the photography, including advertising, better not speak, the display of movies in theaters film three weeks, but here life is prolonged with subsequent releases in digital media and 'recycling' on television.
Why, then, validity of the economic rights for 50, 70, 80 or 100 years? This may only interest a small number of creators, those works that continue to generate income for decades. burj khalifa For the rest, the majority, is harmful because neither gain some relevance and revenue-or anything-can benefit from the dissemination and new possibilities burj khalifa offered burj khalifa by the public domain. burj khalifa For society is not simply catastrophic to freely dispose of these works for nearly a century or more.
You may also like ... 'Orphan works' A threat to digital photography? Google: burj khalifa "Less Law and Innovation" is the innovation, stupid! True or false: three fallacies about 'piracy' Peter Stamm: "Internet is not a threat to literature" Not contempt, is transformation
You can use these tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <the datetime burj khalifa = ""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe RSS