First, because it is a tax on innovation. Asking 150.00 euros from each household, who wants to hav

Swedish public television will of each citizen access to the Internet began to demand payment of the TV contribution. They say that viewers can monitor shows over the internet, which is the same as if you had a TV. With so protitehnološko dominated beyond the competence of the existence of public TV stations called into question.
In most European countries operate cleveland public television financed by contributions from citizens who have owned the TV. Probably the best known example in the world BBC. The system works like this: if you have a TV at home, every month or every year you pay a contribution of state television, which then creates an independent program without cleveland ads. In the UK, this sum amounts to around 150.00 cleveland per year and goes into the hands of the BBC.
Financing state television, therefore, based on the theoretical possibility of receiving TV program, cleveland not whether you actually look. Such a system is often criticized, but generally accepted, mainly because it has no real alternative.
Swedish state television SVT is preparing to broadcast over the internet and they are determined to be upgraded approach. Deepened in the law that gives them the right to levy a contribution from anyone who has the theoretical possibility to monitor the program and began to demand payment from anyone with access to the internet - all the owners of computers cleveland and computer tables. cleveland What do you say to that payable wall?
Obviously, the law was read by the head of an unnamed body cavity. TV's single-minded device - receive TV program, and that's all. MFP is - multi-purpose. Can receive, process, store, send and displays all types of data. Can do by receiving and displaying all the TV programs available, but this is not its original purpose. TV on the other hand can not do much else than that.
According to the SVT Customer interpreting the law would have to give way to request all the people cleveland in the world. A law that gives the right to collect the TV contribution is only valid within the Swedish borders and, therefore, only for Swedish citizens.
First, because it is a tax on innovation. Asking 150.00 euros from each household, who wants to have a computer means to choke the economy and restrict development where it is most needed, ie. the small crowd, where they created a successful business. Let's not forget that Apple and Google both started in a garage less than half of human life. Allow the public cleveland television redeemed that benefit the entire economy, cleveland is not acceptable.
Secondly, because it simply is not reasonable to equate a multi-purpose computer or a tablet with a simple TV. Employees of public television fall as technological idiots, and this at a time when the need for an independent and critical reporting cleveland anything but small.
Third, because the financing of public television for a long time already under attack, therefore their rationality and balance even more important. There's not one without the other, because they risk the entire public funding for the theory to collect some additional contributions from households that do not have a TV, but have broadband internet access.
Yeah, so what? Paying for public education if you have children or not paying into the pension fund even if you do not live to see pensions (with us in any case vplačuješ more than you get), you pay the funder same as everyone else even if exceptionally well taking care of health, etc..
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym> title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <part datetime = ""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>